The High Cost of Diabetes is Killing Americans and our Economy

Background

According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention – CDC , diabetes is a serious disease that affects 30 million Americans with another 86 million individuals who have elevated glucose levels that are considered pre-diabetic.

Diabetes can progress to become the underlying cause of other costly, disabling and deadly conditions such as cardiovascular diseases, damage to the brain, eyes, kidneys, nerves and result in lower limb amputations.

adv-cost-of-diabetes

Diabetes accounts for 4.6 million deaths worldwide and is the 7th leading cause of deaths in the US.

While the cost of treating diabetes and death rates varies considerably among counties, the US leads all other countries with $322 billion annually in direct and indirect costs.

By comparison, the United Kingdom, Japan and Norway have consistently had the lowest death rates due to diabetes over the past five decades and spend only a fraction of what the US does.

Why does the US Spends so Much and Get Such Poor Results?

The answer is simply because pharmaceutical companies, insurance companies and health care providers make billions of dollars with this costly, inefficient and ineffective method of selling, paying and delivering health care in the US.

According to the Center for Responsive Politics – open secrets , the pharmaceutical and health products industry employs more than 3 lobbyists for every member of Congress; spends about $1.2 million lobbying every day Congress is in session. It has also created a career path for loyal Congressional and federal employees to become well-paid private-sector pharma lobbyists.

Hundreds of million dollars are spent each year on lobbying and contributing to House and Senate members to maintain this monopoly and the industry’s control in setting their own drug prices, unlike the rest of the world.

Pharma Net Profits 2005-2012

Pharma’s huge profits occur at the great expense of taxpayers, employers and individuals with diabetes who experience the physical, emotional and financial pain and suffering.

Negative Impact of High Health Care Costs on the Economy

Health care spending in the US far exceeds that of other countries. It consumes 50% more of the economy than other countries. And, high health care expenses have a negative effect on patients, employees, employers, city, county, state and federal governments and the taxpayers that pay higher taxes for this efficient and ineffective system.

High health care expenses increase the cost of everything that is made in America and makes them less competitive to imports that don’t include high health care costs. High medical and drug expenses have resulted in decades of double-digit insurance premium increases, wage stagnation, high personal debt, medical bankruptcies, growing government deficits, higher taxes, the collapse of the middle class and a weaker US economy.

Graphic_H

Price Waterhouse Cooper – PwC   in its Pharma 2020 Vision report concludes: “the current pharmaceutical industry business model is both economically unsustainable and must fundamentally change the way it operates.”

Who Pays for Diabetes

The cost of diabetes treatment in the US continues to rise uncontrollably without any corresponding improvement in outcomes. And taxpayers, employers and patients pay the bills.

HCCIinfographicDiabetesCostFINAL_0

A study by the Health Care Cost Institute – HCCI, showed that employer health insurance spending on employees (under 65) with diabetes was $15,000 a year or 300% more than for people without diabetes.

And, Medicare spending is astronomical with over $5.5 billion dollars being spent on just two diabetes drugs- Januvia and Lantus insulin in 2014.

It Doesn’t Have to be this Way

The most troubling fact is it doesn’t have to be this way. Diabetes is not a rare, deadly infectious disease or an aggressive, deadly form of cancer that can’t be treated. And, no other country in the world allows drug companies to charge these exorbinate prices or regulate and require them to disclose more clinical testing and drug cost information.

Diabetes is a relatively easy to diagnose, monitor and treat disease in the majority of cases with appropriate education and interventions. But like other chronic diseases, diabetes has biological, behavioral, educational, care delivery, political and financial dimensions that need to be addressed in order to improve access to affordable and effective treatment.

Opportunities for Taxpayers to Save Billions and Improve Outcomes of Diabetes Treatment

Politicians frequently campaign on the need to cut wasteful government spending. However, after elected, they protect their sacred cash cows that finance them. They place their political and financial self-interest over the needs of millions of Americans with serious and disabling conditions to have access to affordable and effective health care including prescription drugs.

Numerous studies and reports have indicate that the US wastes hundreds of billions of taxpayer, employer and patient dollars that can be saved by:

  • Congress insuring that all citizens have access to affordable health services like the rest of the develop world.

The excessive financial burden placed on patients with serious and chronic medical conditions that require costly medications and treatment needs to be significantly reduced in employer-sponsored and ACA Exchange High Deductible plans as well as Medicare plans.

  • Medicare, Medicaid, ACA Health Exchange and employer-sponsored plans need to change from paying drug companies and medical providers based on the volume of medications, tests, procedures and visits provided to paying for the value and results of the drugs and treatment provided. To what extent does the treatment cure or manage the progression of the disease and minimize the patients’ pain, suffering and disability?

There is no positive relationship between medical care expenses and success in preventing or managing the debilitating progression of diabetes in the US. 

  • Congress needs to promote competition and free-trade by reducing drug and devise patents terms and extenders consistent with other countries;
  • Congress needs to approve a strict Code of Ethics and Conflict of Interest policies with civil and criminal penalties that prohibits members of Congress and individuals and corporations with a financial interest before the federal government from soliciting or accepting direct or indirect payments, gifts or favors that place private interests over the public good for members of Congress and other federal employees. Investigations and the prosecution of violators should be independent and the responsibility of the US Justice Department and not Congress.
  • The FDA should be adequately funded and authorized to impose sanctions against pharmaceutical companies including the revoking of patents when ethical standards, regulations and laws have been violated;
  • Congress needs to repeal the section of 2003 law that prohibits Medicare (the largest drug purchaser) from establishing reimbursement rates with pharmaceutical companies like the VA and every other country does;
  • Congress needs to eliminating the ban on the importation of lower cost prescription drugs and biologics from Canada and other counties;
  • The Federal government needs to become an equity investor and require a financial return including royalties, from all intellectual property and patents developed and sold that have received government-funded basic & applied research, grants and loans. 
  • Congress needs to ban direct marketing of prescription drugs to consumers and require that pharmaceutical companies fully disclosure the outcome of all clinical trials, drug research and the actual cost of research and development, manufacturing and administration including sales and marketing.

 Summary

The current $322 billion being spent on diabetes with such poor outcomes is not sustainable. For meaningful change to occur, there needs to be major changes in the pricing, financing and delivery of care.

With the entrenched pharmaceutical industry’s interest to maintaining their influence and control over Congress, change will only come about by confronting members of Congress  to determine whether they are for or against actions to lower the price of drugs and medical services, increase transparency and adhere to standards of ethical conduct.

Taxpayers, patients, employers and the US economy are being badly hurt by Congress’s lack of leadership and deference given to the trillion dollar health care and pharmaceutical industries over the interest and needs of American patients, employers and taxpayers.

2016 provides an important opportunity for citizens to learn the positions and records of national candidates for President, the House and Senate and elect candidates who will represent the peoples’ interest over their own political and financial self-interest.

You and your family’s life may depend on it.

Americans Favor Government Action to Lower Prescription Drug Costs

A national poll conducted by Kaiser Health News in August 2015, found that:

  • Over 70% of respondents  believe drug costs are unreasonable.
  • While the vast majority of Americans want lower costs, they differ significantly (based on their political ideology), on how prices should be established.
  • Seventy-six  percent of Republicans believe price changes should occur by the current marketplace competition.
  • By comparison, 57% of Democrat and 43% of Independent respondents support a role for the federal government in reviewing and approving drug prices (similar to what is done in Canada and Europe). Government involvement there has resulted in foreign drug costs being approximately 50% less than in the United States where pharmaceutical companies  establish their own prices.

    There is a consensus among respondents with 94% of Democrats and 84% of Republicans favoring a repeal of the 2003 federal law that prohibits Medicare, (with 55 million subscribers) from negotiating prices directly with drug companies.

Background

Canadian to Foreign Drug Price Ratios

The recent KHN poll is consistent with the growing revolt against the pricing practices of pharmaceutical companies which reached a tipping point when Gilead established the price for Sovaldi, a new drug formulation that is used for the treatment of Hepatitis C, at $1,000 a pill.  Other examples include Vertex’s Kalydeco $300,000 a year price to treat cystic fibrosis and Celgene’s Revlimid price of $150,000 year for the treatment of specific forms of cancer.

Prices for patented-protected drugs for life threatening and disabling diseases such as cancer, heart disease, multiple sclerosis, cystic fibrosis, diabetes, have been rising dramatically over the past decade with no end in sight.

According to Express Scripts, the number of people with prescription drug cost in excess of $100,000 a year in the US, tripled in 2014.

A Call to Action

Various stakeholders including insurance companies, pharmacy management companies, cancer treatment specialists and concerned citizens have begun to mobilize, educate their family, friends and colleagues and communicate their grave concerns and demand action by pharmaceutical companies and federal and state governments.

The Wall Street Journal (7.23.15) has reported that the federal government could save and reduce its deficit by an estimated $16 billion a year if Medicare was not prohibited by Congress from directly negotiate drug prices as they do for Medicaid and the VA. 

If you share these concerns over the astronomically high drug prices that few people can afford and that are bankrupting thousands of individuals and adding to public deficits, two actions you can take are:

1.Read and sign the Change.org Concerned Citizen’s petition protesting the high cost of cancer drugs at: http://chn.ge/1WHY7FD

2. Read and ask your Congressional House member and Senators to co-sponsor and vote for the:

To find out your elected representatives contact info go to: https://www.usa.gov/elected-officials

To subscribe to this blog for more articles on the political and economic dimensions of Medicare plans and policies and their impact on patients’ access to affordable and effective treatment go to http://healthplanadvisor.org.

How Congress Legalized the High Cost of Drugs in 2003

Rapid Growth of Drug Costs in US Compared to Other Countries

The rapid growth in drug prices and profits in the US over the past 12 years since the Medicare drug benefit law was passed in 2003, reflects what pharmaceutical companies believe they can receive from payers thanks to Congress and President Bush. And, the payers of prescription drugs are largely the federal and state governments, insurance companies and ultimately US taxpayers, employers and patients.

While the costs of drugs has been skyrocketing, Congressional leadership has done virtually nothing over the past dozen years to investigate price gouging or even allow Congressional discussions and votes on bills to modify and improve the Medicare drug law.

big-pharma

The costs of pharmaceuticals in the US is $1,000 per person compared to $500 per person for 30 other benchmark counties.

As a result of the rapidly rising prices set by drug makers, federal, state and local taxes and deficits continue to grow, insurance rates continue to escalate and unpaid medical bills are the largest reason personal bankruptcies.

In addition, a large percentage of people whose resources  become depleted and don’t file for bankruptcy, they become eligible for Medicaid and their medical expenses are then shifted directly to federal, state and local taxpayers.

            Bankruptcy-Causes

As a result, Americans have substantially less access to affordable medications unlike most other countries around the world.

At the same time, Congress and many health care providers and researchers continue to accept millions of dollars each year from Big Pharma in support of their financial needs and interests.

corruption

How Other Countries Control the Costs of Drugs

As illustrated below, the 2013 Canadian Patented Medicine Prices Review Board’s (CPMPRB) Annual Report, indicates that the average price of drugs in the US is 100% more than in Canada and other benchmark European countries.

Canadian to Foreign Drug Price Ratios

The huge price differential is attributed to the role and commitment that other governments have in assuring that their citizens have access to affordable and effective health care including new therapeutic drugs.

In Canada and Europe, the national governments review and approve the drug makers proposed prices based on a number of factors including: their cost; the evidence of added clinical benefits and outcomes; the comparative price in other countries; and the evidence of added value that these new therapeutics provide to patients over existing drugs.

None of this occurs in the United States.

 Drug makers set their prices unilaterally and may offer discounts to large buyers with the exception of Medicare, which has 55 million beneficiaries. This is due to the legislation approved by Congress and President Bush in 2003.

Growing Backlash from Stakeholders and Advocates

Big Pharma’s years of monopoly, greed, unethical sales and marketing has finally reached a tipping point. It has resulted in a revolt by various stakeholders including internationally known doctors, medical centers, pharmacy benefit management companies, insurance companies, advocates, patients, state governments, the media and federal prosecutors.

Cancer Specialists Take the Lead in a Call to Action

According to the Wall Street Journal, the highly respected, Dr. Leonard Saltz, chief of gastrointestinal oncology at Memorial Sloan Kettering Hospital (MSKCC), used the June    conference of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) that was attended by 25,000 to express his harsh and growing criticism of the ever-growing high cost of cancer drugs.

physician group

Dr. Saltz’s illustrated the issues with Bristol-Myers Squibb’s new experimental regime that combines two drugs for the treatment of melanoma. While he acknowledged that the benefits of these drugs were truly remarkable, he noted that they would cost about $295,000 a year per patient.

Dr. Saltz observed that if all patients in the US with metastatic cancer took drugs priced at $295,000 a year, it would cost $174 billion, just for one year and that is neither affordable nor sustainable.

He went on to add that the cost of cancer-drugs has more than doubled in recent years and the cost increases are not always related to their increased value or any substantial improvement in treatment outcomes.

Dr. Saltz also recommends that Medicare needs to change the way it pays doctors for infused drugs to eliminate the financial incentives and conflicts of interest, resulting in doctors using the most expensive versus the most cost-effective drugs.

In July, over 100 highly-respected cancer specialists from across the country published and signed a commentary in the journal, Mayo Clinic Proceedings. These oncology and hemotology clinicians voiced their outrage over the years of soaring cancer drug prices.

They called for new government intervention in regulating these costly therapeutics in the absence of any industry self-regulation or restraint.

They reiterated the need for Congress to repeal the provisions of the 2003 Medicare Modernization Act that bans Medicare from  negotiating prices directly with pharma companies (saving $16 billion a year) and to decriminalize the importation of drugs from Canada and other countries at a fraction of the cost charged in the United States.

The group also recommended the establishment of a new regulatory body that would help set drug prices after they received FDA approval and for Congress to reform patent laws that can restrict the timely development of less expensive generic drugs.

They also suggested that the newly created Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute and similar groups include the cost of drugs in their assessment of the value of treatment.

The cancer treatment leaders also urged other cancer specialists to critically consider:

  • the cost of different drug options and the financial burden placed on patients; and
  • the evidence of comparative benefits, side-effects, outcomes and limitations of different drugs when recommending treatment options to patients and families.

To assist cancer specialist, doctors at MSKCC have created a DrugAbacus calculator to assist in the education of clinicians and patients. The calculator currently provides information on 54 cancer drugs and calculates the relative value of drugs by adjusting the price to reflect both side-effects and benefits that they bring in extending life.

Finally, the cancer treatment leaders encouraged a public education campaign regarding these issues and a grassroots effort to protest the high cost of drugs and to demand changes that are in the best interests of patients.

Negative Media Exposure

In an October, 2014 60 Minutes interview, Dr. Saltz, MSKCC, provided the example of when the new patented drug, Zaltrap, was approved by the FDA for treating advanced colon cancer. He compared Zaltrap to Avastin, a similar drug that had been on the market and concluded that both deliver the same result – extending the median survival by 42 days. However, Zaltrap cost $11,000 a month, more than double the cost of Avastin. As a result, MSCC took the unprecedented position to reject  using Zaltrap over Avastin at MSCC due to its substantially higher costs and lower value.

Dr. Saltz added that the high cost of drugs has negatively impacted patient care and high insurance co-payments have forced some patients to forego effective therapies because of the financial burden it imposes on them and their families.

Op-Eds and Editorials critical of Big Pharma’s pricing practices and its negative impact on public health and the plight of individuals have appeared in various media including 60 Minutes, The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, USA Today, The Washington Post, Bloomberg, News, CNN and a variety of professional and public publications.

The High Cost of Other Specialty Drugs

The controversy surrounding high-priced patented drugs and biologics in the US is not limited to cancer treatment. It is also present with drugs for the treatment of other debilitating chronic diseases such as AIDS, diabetes, hepatitis C, multiple sclerosis cystic fibrosis, and various mental illnesses that affect millions of Americans.

Pharma Net Profits 2005-2012Bloomberg Business and the professional journal Neurology have reported that old brand-name medications for MS have become more expensive with each new therapy that has been developed.

Medications for MS that were introduced years ago now cost as much as newer, high-priced therapies. Now, all the MS drugs cost between $50,000 and $65,000 a year including the ones that were sold for less than $10,000 when they were first introduced.

Express Scripts, a large pharmacy benefit management company (PBMC) just reported that for the fourth consecutive year, medications to treat diabetes (which affect 29 million Americans) were the most expensive traditional therapy class.

The annual spending for drugs increased 18% in 2014, primarily from a 16% increase in specialty drugs.

Gilead’s new Hepatitis C drugs: Sovaldi and Harvoni are sold in the US for $1,000+ a pill and up to $100,000+ for a course of treatment. However, Gilead sells the same drug in the United Kingdom, where prices are regulated, for 33% less

In 2014, Gilead cashed-in more than $12 billion in sales revenue just from these two Hepatitis C drugs. And, there are more than 3 million Americans that have Hep. C, an infectious disease that can lead to cirrhosis, cancer and liver failure.

Forbes estimates that Gilead could make $227 billion, if it just treated all the US cases of Hep.C.

Other examples include Vertex’s new drug, Kaydeco for cystic fibrosis costs $300,000 a year and Cegene’s drug for multiple myleoma costs $150,000 a year.

Impact of High US Pharmaceutical Prices on Patients, Taxpayers, Employers and Governments.

According to the Health Research Institute (HRI), only 4% of patients currently use specialty drugs, but those drugs account for 25% of total US drug spending.

The impact of the unregulated, US pharmaceutical industry’s pricing is increasing taxes and adding consumer and government debt as spending for drugs has gone through the roof.

To illustrate, the number of people in the US with prescription drug expenses greater than $100,000 a year has tripled in 2014 according to Express Scripts.

The dramatic increase in budget-busting government spending for prescription drugs is reflected in financial reports of the US Departments of Veterans Affairs and Defense; Cities, Counties, States; prisons and jails; Medicaid, Medicare; and public and private employers.

When spending for drugs becomes so inflated, individuals, employers and governments spend disproportionately more for health care and drugs, and have to cut back on spending for other sectors of the US economy as well as go into debt.

These enormous expenses have also resulted in insurance companies and employers cutting back/eliminating/shifting health insurance expenses to their subscribers, employees and government to pay. Some private insurance companies and the VA have also had complaints filed against them for rationing and denying the use of expensive drugs.

According to Kaiser Health News, over 70% of Americans say “the costs of prescription drugs are unreasonable”. And, about 25% report that they or their family members ‘have not filled prescriptions in the past year and/or have skipped or cut pills in half because of these high costs.’

These high costs have also resulted in substantially higher insurance premiums with higher subscriber deductibles/co-pays and growing rates of unpaid health care expenses and personal bankruptcies.

Summary

Taxpayers and the US economy are being badly hurt by Congress’s irresponsible actions and preferential treatment of Big Pharma over patients, taxpayers, employers and other stakeholders.

This situation is very damaging to Americans and has grown to crises proportions. Congress needs to begin acting in the public interest like other governments in Canada and Europe.

A future blog will highlight some the promising actions underway aimed at reducing the these problems.

I look forward to your comments.